Neutron well logging



July 18, 1950 R. E. FEARON ET AL 2,515,502

NEuTRoN WELL LOGGING Filed July 1o, 194e 4 sheets-sheet 2 July 18, Y1950 R. E. FEARON ET Al. 2,515,502

NEUTRON WELL LOGGING Filed July l0, 1948 4 Sheets-Sheet 5 SMQ/www July 18` 1950 R. E. FEARoN ET Al. 2,515,502

NEUTRON WELL LOGGING Filed July l0, 1948 4 Sheets-Sheet 4 Patented July 18, 1950 UNITED STATES NT OFFICE NEUTRON WELL LOGGING Delaware i Application July 10, 1948, Serial No. 38,137

l This` invention relates to the art ci subsurface exploration, principally oil Well logging, and more particularly to a radioactivity type of exploration in which a source of fast neutrons is used in conjunction with a gamma-raymdetector. Commercially such a radioactivity 10g made by `the use of `a source of fast neutrons and a gammaray detector is known as a neutron log. This ,is true despite the fact that no neutrons are directly detected.

In recent years neutron .oil Well logs have achieved `a degree of popularity ,not shared by the logs made by other methods. Thm is believed to tbe attributable to the fact that, in a substantial proportion of surveys made, they correlate more accurately With the lithology` of the strata penetrated by thewell. These logs have been made. by traversing the Well with a source of neutrons, usually 300 to 500 millicuries of'radium By extensive experimentation we have discovered that the neutron log does not in many important instancesadequately depict the lithologc properties of the-strata surveyed. We have care-- .fully investigated and correlated numerous instances -cf this and, as a result offexhaustive study and experimentation, we believe `that `We have now found thesolution to this problem and have `discovered how to make adequate neutron dogs of -oil Wells, and analogous subsurface pas,- sages, in virtually all instances.

One of the facts which we havediscovered is thatprior Workers have not, in making `and interpreting their logs, taken into consideration the `variation in scattering from point to point in `the Well oi the primary-gamma radiation emitted bythe neutron source and detected by the ionization chamber along with the `gamma radiation `resulting from the neutron processes occurring fin 4the strata. We .have -found that this a very important factor.

The radium-beryllium source, which has been accepted as astandard neutron source by those working in the art, is composed of an alpha rayer in the form of radium, `atomic number 38 and mass number '226, in secular equilibrium with its l Claims. (Cl. Z50-83.6)

daughter products, intimately mixed with a target material, beryllium. The mixture is enclosed in a metallic capsule which in turn is surrounded by a lead shield made as thick as practical, the diameter of the Wells to bclogged being the limiting factor. The lead shield is used as an attenuator or gamma radiation which `is emitted by the source mixture along with the neutrons. We have found, however, that such a source emits gamma radiation far in excess of that which we have found permissible in making uniformly good logs under various well conditions.

We have also investigated the effect oi gamma rays naturally emitted by the strata penetrated by a Well, and We have found that` the ionizing processes which they cause to occur in the detector are ordinarily s mallin comparison with those occurring due to the primary radiation When a conventional source of neutrons sufficiently strong for `satisfactory logging is used. Therefore, no further reference will be made to them in this application.

In addition to our above mentioned discovery that primary gamma radiation from the radiumberyllium source is responsible in an important Way for serious inadequacies in the logs, we have further discovered that a good neutron log can be made in virtually any bore hole by employing neutrons largely free from accompanying `gamma radiation, and by otherwise following the disclosure of this application.

Pure radium, atomic number 88 and mass num-l ber 226, would be ideally suited for use in such a neutron source,'because it can be used to provide neutrons and it doesnot emit gamma radiation. Radium, however, does not remain in a pure state for the reason that it is continually decaying to form daughter products, some oi which are strong gamma rayers. Radium therefore goes into secular equilibrium with its daughter products. The nuclear processes which are continually taking place in radium are as iollows:

Radium, atomic number 88 and mass number 226, is an alpha rayer which emits alpha rays of from 4 to 5 m. e. v. energy and in so doing decays to form radon, a gas. Radon also emits alpha radiation. The capsule in which the source materialis contained retains this radon gas as it is formed, `and itgoes to equilibrium. Radon is a powerful alpha rayer, giving ori alpha rays of 6 m. e. v. energy. In emitting alpha rays of this energy it decays to radium A, which is also jan alpha rayer. Radium A, by the emission of Valpha radiation, decays to radium B. Radium sion of 'both alpha and gamma rays to form radium C. Radium C', by the emission of alpha radiation, decays to form radium D, and radium Y C", by the emission of beta radiation, also decays to form radium D. Radium D decays by the emission of beta and gamma radiation to' form radium E. This gamma radiation is very soft` having an energy of only 0.047 m. e. v. Ra-

dium E, by the emission of beta radiation, de-

cays to 4form radium F, and radium F in turn, by the emission of alpha radiation, decays to form lead, atomic number 82 and mass num-k ber 206, which is stable. Y

Since all of the elements in the above series t are in secular equilibrium, it can be seen that there are present some daughter products which emit hard gamma Vradiation which cannot be greatly attenuated by a lead shield of practical dimensions which would t into a Well. Those hard bamma rays which are not absorbed by the shield enterthe walls ofthe well and are scattered thereby, and some of them reach the detector where they are detected.

The beta radiation emitted by certain of the above daughter products when stopped by a target material produces gamma rays of about l0.6 m. e. v. This action is comparable to that of an X-ray tube, the stopping material being the target. The chances of stopping abeta ray to produce gamma raysare, however, small, about one in 1000, and we have found that this phenomena is not of significant importance in the neutron logging process.

The nuclear reaction which occurs in the source capsule which produces fast neutrons is `:il-Ie4 (alpha particle) -l-iBe9 l(beryllium) 6G12 (carbon) -i-uNl l(neutron) -lhv (gamma radiation) vThe neutrons produced by the above reaction have an energy of approximately 5 m. e. v. For every neutron produced by they above reaction a photon of gamma radiation having an energy of approximately 3 m. e. v. is produced. Gamma radiation of this energy can be ltered with a practical amount `of lead shield, commensurate with drill hole dimensions, to about one gamma ray to four neutrons,

We have discovered that these last mentioned two. sources of gamma radiation, viz., gamma rays produced by beta ray and alpha ray impingement on target material are tolerable in good neutron logging. The gamma radiation which we have discovered not to be tolerable is that originating with the equilibrium mixture of the radium and its daughter products. To summarize, the signifiin the vicinity of the source, and some of the scattered radiation reaches the detector in varying amounts and is recorded, along with the desired gamma radiation produced by neutron rey'actions in the strata. In many cases, the scattered gamma radiation reaching the detector is substantially constant for all portions of the well. In these cases neutron logs can be made with the radium-beryllium source which are reliable and ,which truly correlate with the geology of the strata penetrated by the wells. This is due to the fact that the ionizing processes occurring in the detector which are produced by the scattered gamma rays are at a substantially constant rate resulting in a correspondingly constant flow of output current in the electrode circuit of the detector. Under these circumstances the ionizing processes in the detector produced by the desired gamma radiation resulting from neutron reactions in the strata, and Which vary in rate in accordance with lithological characteristics of the strata, will be superimposed on those due to the scattered gamma radiation which originates in the neutron source. The output current from the detector then is composed of two components: one of substantially constant magnitude, that due to detected scattered gamma radiation, and one varyingin magnitude in accordance with the lithological characteristics of the strata, that due to gamma radiation produced by neutron reactions occurring in the strata. Only in such cases can a neutron log be made with such a Source that accurately represents the lithological characteristics of the formations. There is no way of determining from the log itself before, during, or after the making of the log if the well is one of this type. This is a very important consideration, because frequently there is no Way of knowing whether the log is or is not an accurate log.

Usually, while logging with a standard radiumberyllium source, the gamma radiation emitted by the source is scattered by the walls of the wells and reaches the detector in an amount which depends upon the size of the boring, the character of the rocks (largely density) the thickness of the casing, the density of fluid in the well, and possibly to a small extent upon other factors. Since `these factors vary with depth in a manner which does not necessarily agree with, but is often opposite to, the properties of the formations which cause the neutron reactions, the result is to obscure, nullify, and often reverse the deflections of the log that are due to detected gamma radiation which is produced by neutron reactions in the formations. In particular, all moderately small deections are subject to suspicion since ordinarily it cannot be determined whether they are due to changes in the porosity or other factors affecting the neutron reactions in the formations, or are due to such factors as slight changes in diameter of the well or density of the formations which change the amount of scattered gamma radiation. c Y

We have discovered and demonstrated that We can make a good log using a neutron source which does in fact emit some gamma radiation provided, however, that the variation of the dearranca method which we have discovered Ydepends upon the .provision of particular types of neutron sources. .'I'he term sources is used here to include the neutron producing reactants, and their container and all shields, in -other Words, everything that is inside .the outer surface of the source enclosure.

'We have discovered that radium 'Ras an alpha rayer, and beryllium, as a targetmaterial, cn- Stitute an excellent source or neutrons 'for the purpose .of this application. Radiu'mrF is ideally of suited for the reason that itgives .off no gamma radiation and .has Yno daughter products which ,gamma radiation. y Radium F, however, has afshorthalf-life, .'140 days, 'andlor thisl reason must be replaced too often tol make it alone an entirelysatisfactory .source .of ,alpha radiation.

We have, however, `found Vfa solution to 'this prhblem. We have discovered and -demnstrated how to .provide .a source, 'having all .the advantages oi radium F and avoiding the serious disadiiantage noted above, -and at the saine time being `free `from any new disadvantage. In accordance with our invention an adequate surce oi neutrons is provided which is substantiauy constantover` a .long period .andis vfree from nontlerable undesired phenomena.

One embodiment of this 4aspect of our inventioniuvowes the use of radiumn. Radium 1D, as pointed .outabova decays by the emission of beta radiation to raaiumjE. 4The'han-life .of raaiur'n Dis approximately22years. It is, however, Inot an alpha rayer. .Radium E. a daughterproduct ofradium D, by the emission of beta radiation decays =to radium npolonium, 4the desired alpha rayer. dum. G, stable lead, are in .secular equilibrium, thasunphv of radium in is continually being replenished. The result isthat, by using radium iin the source, we provide an -alpha rayer, radium which vin effect has -a half-life of '22 yearsl Radinm D vand 'E emit substantially no gamma radiation. Any vgamn'ia radiation given -by .radium D and E Ais soft and can be attenuated with a minimum of shielding, and `presents..n problem Whatever in the design f a practical source. `Such a source would still emit gam-ma. .radiation which results from the alpha rayberyllum reaction that produces the fast neutrons. "This .gamma radiation when emitted.

by ,thereactant `materials has an energy of approimately .3 Inl-e. v. Gamma radiation yof such energy cannot be greatly attenuated with a lead shieldof practical thickness. AItacan,'howev.er, be reducedto approximately .one quanta of gamma radiation for every4 'four neutrons emitted.- WeV have .determined that this proportion of gamma radiation is well within tolerable limits. Compafedto the 'Standard source, that Which utilizes asreactant materials radium (atomic number `88l and nSS number '226), secular equilibrium Since radium D, E and F; as Well as ra- .6 with its daughter products, and beryllium, the source above discussed embodying our invention is approximately 5000 times .better from the point of View of quanta of gamma `radiation per neutron emitted from the exterior surface thereof.

It will be noted that, .in discussion of neutron sources, the prior art has heretofore regarded a great variety of alpha rayers with a variety of target materials as equivalents when used as reactant materials for `producing fast neutrons. A consideration of the above facts will show that such an assumption of equivalence between such materials as radium (atomic number 88 and mass number 226), in secular equilibrium with its daughter products, and radium both working uponberyllium targets, would be completely fallacious.

A practical source, which approaches what we have found to be the upper` tolerable 4limit of the proportion of photons of gamma radiation emitted to neutrons emitted, may be defined as one which emits 500 times less gamma radiation than the standard neutron source, namely, the source' which utilizes radium, (atomic number 88 and mass number 226), in secular equilibrium with its daughter products, and beryllium as vreactant materials. There is radiated from the outside of the shield of the standard neutron source about 1000 quanta of gamma radiation for each neutron that is emitted. We have found that, in a satisfactory source, two quanta of gamma radiation for each neutron emitted can be tolerated. Such a source, although approximately 8 times worse than oui` radium D-beryllium source describedabove, is believed still to be within tolerable limits, but not necessarily the equivalent of our preferred sources for all purposes. A source whose gamma radiation does not exceed the tolerable limits described above is sometimes .referred to hereinafter as a source substantially free from gamma radiation.

Another embodiment of this aspect of our invention utilizes actinium (atomic number 89 and mass number 227), in secular equilibrium with its daughter products, as an alpha rayer, and beryllium as a target material. Actinium has ve alpha `rayers among its daughter products in Secular equilibrium with it. 'The energy of the alpha radiation given oi by each of these ve members is about 1 m. e .v. higher than the alpha radiation emitted by radium (atomic number 88 and mass number 226), and each of its daughter products. Additionally, since the alpha radiation from actinium is more energetic than that from the members of the radium series, the mixture of actinium and beryllium does not need to be as intimate as `the mixture of radium and beryllium. The number ot' gamma rayers in that part of the actinium series that is of interest is comparable to that of the radium series. However, the highest energy of the gamma rays emitted by the actinium series is o uite low by comparison, lying between 0.3 and 0.4 m. e. v. We can without difficulty provide a lead shield of practical dimensions for well logging which will attenuate this gamma radiation. One inch of lead will adequately attenuate this gamma radiation.

Another aspect of our invention is that an eX- tremely small source can be used, or actinum in very impure state can be used. Actinium in secular equilibrium with its daughter products is approximately two times better than .radium (atomic number 88 and mass number 226), in secular equilibrium with its daughter products,

pery millicurie of activity for producing neutrons and approximately 12 times better than 'radium D, insecular equilibrium with its daughter products, per millicurie of activity. The weight ratio for equal radioactivity units of actinium K to radium D is 13.5/22. 'The Weight ratio, for equal radioactivity units, of 'actinium to radiurn (atomic number 88 and mass number 226), is 13.5/1590.'

Therefore, Weight for Weight, actinium bears a neutron producing ratio to radium of 3180/ 13.5, or approximately 235. This means that,`in accordance With our invention, it is possiblev to'use actinium Which is approximately 235 times less pure than radium in the same space and with equal results from the point of View of quantity of neutrons produced. Due to the need .forrrless thickness of shield by a factor of 10, 100 times as much space becomes available for the source material. Therefore, actinium can have a degree of impurity which is one part actinium in 23,500, so long as the impurities are not gamma rayers. Such an alpha rayer, when used with beryllium, and the mixture provided With a practical amount of lead shielding, compares favorably With radium D, in secular equilibrium with its daughter products, as to the gamma radiation and neutrons emitted from the outer surface of the source.

Although beryllium has been recited above as a target material it is to be understood that other light materials such as lithium and boron can be used.

A `Well-logging neutron source which employs any of the aboveneutron-producing reactants, which are described as illustrative embodiments of our invention, and a practical gamma-radiation attenuating shield, would thus fall within the limits of toleration defined above for a practical source for the purposes of this invention.

The primary object of this invention is the provision of method and apparatus for producing neutron logs which accurately and consistently depict the lithological characteristics of the formations penetrated by bore holes. It is an object of this invention to provide method and apparatus, comprising a source of neutrons, for obtaining a log of subsurface formations which corresponds to neutron reactions occurring in the formations which are occasioned by neutrons emanating from the source.

It is further an object of the invention to delineate the eiect on neutron logs of gamma radiation other than that produced by desired neutron reactions in the formations, and to identify and eliminate the most damaging source of this undesired radiation. It is also a purpose of this invention to apprehend and evaluate all undesired gamma radiation, to determine tolerable limits, and to provide method and apparatus for restricting same Within such limits, including the provision of shielding where such means is effective in attaining said tolerable limits.

An important object of this invention is to dei-lne and provide a class of neutron sources by means of which accurate neutron logs can reliably be produced. It is an object of the invention to provide economically and scientifically practicable neutron sources of adequate permanence and strength which are essentially or tolerably free of gamma ray emission. Speciiically, it is an object of the invention to provide a neutron source which. employs radium D, in secular equilibrium With its daughter products and a material such as beryllium, as neutron producing reaotant materials; a neutron source which 8V employs actiniumiatomic number89 and mass number 22.7), in secular 'equilibrium with its daughter products, and a material suchI Vas be'- rylliurnas neutron producing reactant materials:A

and a neutron source which employs poloniumand a material, such as beryllium, as neutron producingvreactant materials. It is a further., object to provide said actinium source in notably small physical dimensions, if desired. Itis' also,` an object toprovide the said actinium source inI proper strength and quality, but nevertheless in highly impure state as regards the actinium alpha rayer, provided the impurities are not gamma;

rayers. 1t is also'an object to provide a neutron source, having a practicably constant strength' and a practicably long; half-life, which contains,l

as an active constituent, an alpha particle emitter of 'short half-life which is continually replenf" isl'ied.`

'Other objects and" advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the follow# ing detailed description when considered vvitlfy ing operation in which a fragment of the surface I0 ofl the earth is shown in vertical section. 'A

well II penetrates the earths surface and ymayv or may not be cased. Disposed within the'wellI isrzthe subsurface instrument I2 of the Well logging system which additionally comprises a cable I3 for suspending the instrument in the well, a' drum I4 from which cable is paid out or on which" cable is Wound when causing the capsule I2 to'v traverse the vvell,l electrical connections from slip-rings on the axle of the drum I4 to an am# plier I5, which is turn is electrically'connected'v to a recorder I6 in a conventional manner. Recorder I6 is driven through a transmission I1 byv the drum I4 as the cable is paid out from or' wound thereon. The record thus made by the recorder as the capsule I2 traverses the drill hole will be in correlation with depth. Y

As shown in Figure 2, the capsule I2 comprises" a neutron source I8 forming the bottom portion thereof and a gamma-radiation detecting system indicated generally as I9 which makes up'the` upper portion of the capsule. The gamma-radiation detecting equipment I9 can be such as kthat disclosed in Patent No. 2,349,225, or such as tliat shownA in Patent No. 2,390,965. For purposes of'V describing this invention, an ionization chamberl 20 is shown as the radiationsensitive element.

As disclosed in Patent No. 2,308,361, the opera-f tion of a system of this character When produc` ing a neutron log is that the capsule I2, made up ofa source of neutrons I8 and a gamma-radia-'- tion detection system I9; is caused to 'traverse a" well. Neutrons emitted from the source enter the walls of the well and by nuclear reaction with matter containedfin the Walls, produce gamma radiation in'amounts proportional to the litho-V logical characteristics of the materials of which.. the Walls are formed. These gamma radiationsV produced 4by nuclear reactions in the strata are detected by the lgamma-radiationV detector 2liz by producingv electrical signals that are related@ in magnitude to the intensity of the gamma. radiation detected, andl these signals are amplified by4 an amplifier 2l and transmittedover conductors contained inthe cable I3 to.the surface of'the earth,Y where if necessary, they are' further amplified'by the amplifier I5 and recorded by the recorder' I6I in correlation with the depth at which they were detected.

It is to be understoodV that any conventional well-logging gamma-radiation detecting vand recording system can be employed in conjunction with a proper neutron source while practising that*l form of the present' invention in whichV a neutron log is made directly.

Commercially alog made 'by the above described operations is known as a neutron log. This is true although nov neutrons `are directly detectedv and recorded; vthe record is one of gamma radiationintensity versus depth. Those working in the artfhaye heretofore assumedV that such a log, made withthe standard'radium-beryllium source, truly represents an effect produced in the strata by irradiating the stratawith neutrons. That is; the log was purported to be` a measurement of the gamma radiation' produced by the nuclear reaction of neutrons and elements `contained in the strata versus'depth Research, however, has shown that this is not the case. The log made by the'commercial neutron'loggingmethod is a composite' log that isproduced While recording at e least twoeffects; These effects are:

l. Gamma radiation arising from` the interaction ofneutrons with substances in the strata. 2.. Gamma radiationwhich has been emitted bytheneutro'n source and'by direct or indirect paths arrives at the detector.

Thefirst of these effects is the desired effect which correlates With the lithological properties of jthe formations penetrated by a well and serves admirably as anindex by means of which the formationscan be identified. The other effect is undesirable since it'leads to erroneous interpretation of the log. Therefore We havefound that in order for aneutron log to` truly depict the lithological characteristics of the formations penetrated by a well, that the second effect must be minimized or largely eliminated and that the first effect must be augmented.

This is illustrated Vin Figures 3a to 3h. In these figures there are reproduced sections of logs-made of a particular well' from a depth of 2800 feet to i a depth' of 2980jfeet. Figure 3a is a standard neutron log in duplicate; that is, it isa log which hasbeen made.. while using. the so-called stand` In: order to determine the effect of gamma. radiation which was emitted by the neutron..

source andscattered by. the strata lining the well,k a log was made of the same, portion ofthe well" while using a neutron-.free gamma-.ray source.which emitted gamma radiationoff the same intensity as that .emittedby the standard neutron source. This .log is shown in Figure 3171 Itwill be noted that the variation of `detected scattered gamma radiation is quite small in com.- parisonto the variation of detected gamma radi.-

- 3d were made.

10 ation. in Figure 3a. Therefore, from this log it is safe to assume that the two logs shown in Fig# ure. 3a are of gamma' radiation. produced by neutron reactions in the strataV versus depth.

In order'to show 'the' variation in the effectproduced-byg'amm'a radiation which has been scattered by the formations andhas reached the detecting, instrument,V the same well; logs of which are shown inFiguresSa and 3b, was shot with nitroglycerinal A. caliper log was then made of that.'= portion. ofi the well'between the depths of 2'860feet and 2938.01feet. This caliper log is shown in, Figure 3c: This log shows that enormous' cavitieewere created in the well, and the inner walls thereof.; are anything butsmooth. The diameter of they hole. varies over a Wide range. After thewel1 hadbeen shot.` a standard neutron log` was again made.Y By separate operationsthis' log. was. duplicated. 'Ilfiese two logs` are shown? .in-Figure. 341.] By comparing these two logs to' thoseV shoumin. Figure, 3a it will be seenthat they? inno. way. resemble each other. All parameter-si. other than the. diameter of thev drill hole .re-l mained constantwhen the-logs of Figuresawandl This. clearlyillustratesY the effect of 'thevariaton in well'dameter on tl'ie'standard`V neutronlog.. Although .the effect -of large changes"V in.. welll diameter are illustrated by these logs; itf.

has .beenfoundthatVariations of as little as 1/2'" in. well diametenwill-produce variations inthe standard neutron log which might lead to erroneous interpretation.

Now. compare the-logs. shown in Figure 3e tor those shown in Figure. 3d.. The. two logs shown inliiguree. are, logs which-.have been made while using. ai. neutronefree, gamma-ray source,` the. gamin arrays `emitted fromwhichiwere of the same. intens-ity as those emitted, by. the standard neutron source. Atv a glance. these logs appear to be duplicates.. This. is because the--effectof scat-y tered, gamma radiation. which fhas. been femitted by the. source.. has varied-` widely with. the hole diameter..v Infact, the logs made with the neu.- tronffree. gamma-ray. source (Figure 3e), correlate. withthe caliper log..i(Figure 3c). The log. otfligurefe truly represents the Variation in. de; tected-scattered gamma radiation whichwas emitted? by the gamma-ray source.. The logl of.. Figure Tiflis essentially a..caliner log of the welll rather than a logmf lithological characteristics.

Since thev variation of detectedscattered gramm airadation. ieI for the.- greater part attributableto theyariation inwell diameter. if oneisubtracts the logs-made whileusingi-.a neutron-free gammafmy source from those used. by then standard-neutron sour-3m aaloe should be'vobwl itaiarie'et` vwhichrwould truly` represent a measuref of the` -garnmaradia-tioni produced byneutronre' actions inthef-strata versusdepth;` This has* thereafter. reaching-the detector must-be taken.

into consideration and. largely. eliminated( As clearly.illustratedabove in Figures Baute. 3f, .in wells where the diameter varies from .point'td point in depth,.the eiiect ofthedetectedscattered gammaradiation is to obscure,.nullify.-and` even. reversef the deflectionsof the ..log..that are 11 due to detected gamma rays which are `produced by neutron reactions inthe formations;

We have found that the solution to `this `problem is to use a neutron source which does not emit more than a tolerable number of photons of gamma radiation per neutron produced.` As pointed out above, radium D, in secular equi-v librium with its daughter products, and beryllium make a neutronsource which is ideally suited for neutron logging when a shield of practical density and thickness is used about the reactant materials. The neutron producing reaction of such a source will produce one photon of gamma radiation for each neutron produced. The use of a shield of practical density and thickness will attenuatethe number of photons of gamma radiation to approximately one photon of gamma radiation for every four neutrons emitted from the external surface of the source. This ratio of gamma radiation to neutrons is Well within the tolerable limits of a practical neutron source. Primary gamma radiation of such intensity, after having been scattered by the formation adjacent the drill hole, isnegligible. The intensity of the gamma radiation which arises from neutron reactions with elements contained in the formations is sufficiently greater by comparison that variationsdueto lithological characteristics of thestrata are outstanding on the logover any effect produced by .the scattered gamma radiation. n

, The same section of the particular well, whose logs have been discussed above in connection with Figures 3a to 3f, has been logged while using a radium D, in equilibrium with its Vdaughter productsand beryllium neutron source, itbeing understood that the shield of practical density,

and thickness is an. essential element of the source. illustrated in Figure 3g. Except for a difference inoverall amplitude, due to a difference in sensitivity of the recorder, the log shown in 3g compares favorably with the subtraction log shown in Figure 3f. A log made with the same source after that section of the well has been shot is shown in Figure 3h.` Except for general overall variations in amplitude, this log also correlates quite closely with the subtraction log of Figure 3f. lithological characteristics of the strata even when the diameter oi thehole varies.`

Although the correlation of the radium D logs A log made before the well was shot is- Therefore thev radium D log will portray with the subtraction log of Figure 3f is quite limit thatV caribeV used in a practical neutron source, whereas approximately five times this amount would be more desirable. As the curie activity of the radium D in the source is' increased, more neutrons are produced in the source and emitted thereby. `The reproducibility of the radium D-neutron-source logs increases ThisV amount substantially as the square root of the number of.

neutrons emitted -by the source. The more neutrons there are entering the strata the more gamma radiation will be produced by their reactions with elements in the strata, resulting in a substantially corresponding increase in the number of photons of.A gamma radiation which produce ionization processes inthe detector. `In

fact, if the intensity of the usefulY gamma ra diation is suiciently great, the sensitivity of the recording system can be reduced toa point where its response to the statistical or random processes will be negligible. Relatively speaking, the use of a radium D-beryllium source of adequate strength will minimize or largely eliminate the undesired effects and augment the desired effect.-

In `addition `to the use of yradium'uD and itsI daughter products as an alpha rayer in a neutron source for well logging actinium,` atomic1 number 89 and mass number 227, in secular, equilibrium 'with its daughter products can be.

used. As pointed out above, actinium and its daughter products haveflve alpha rayers, each of which emits alpha radiation having energies:

approximately 1 m. e. v. higher than the alphav radiation emitted byradium, atomic number S8.

and mass number 226, and its daughter products. Although actinium, atomic number 89 andv mass number 227, in equilibrium with its daugh`.

ter products, when used as an alpha rayer in a neutron source, may be used in the same manner as radium and radium D,fit is not the equivalent of either. The neutron source produced by the` use of actinium hasproperties which are entirely different from those produced by the use of radium or radium Das alpha rayers. From the point of view of neutrons produced per millicurie activity, actinium is twice as good as radium,

atomic number 88 and mass number 226, plus its products, and twelve times better than radium D plus its products. Actinium further differs from radium, atomic number 88 and mass number 226,

in that the gammaradiation naturally emittedl 1. Neutron well logging apparatus which com-l prises a source of neutrons of the alpha rayer-` target type, in which the alpha rayer consists of i at least one short half-life member present in a l radioactive series and is in secular equilibrium with a parent member of relatively long halflife and all members of the series being substantially gamma-ray free, whereby the alpha-rayer will be maintained substantially free of gamma radiation and maintained at substantially conf st anl'l alpha-ray-emitting strength for a period of time at least as long as its normal half-life, and in which the target material is disposed in neutron-producing v relationship with said alpha rayer, means for moving said source of neutrons within a well in proximity to respective formations through which the well extends thereby to bombard said formationswith neutrons, a detector associated with said source of neutrons for detecting gamma radiationgproduced by the aiotion of the neutrons in the respective formations, and means for recording said detected radiation in correlation with well depth.

2. Neutron well logging apparatus which comprises a source of neutrons of the alpha rayertarget type, in `which the alpha rayer consists of a radioactive series which is 89 actinium 227 in secular equilibrium with its daughter products,

whereby the alpha-rayers of the daughter prodi ucts will be maintained .substantially free of gamma radiation `and maintainedat substantially constant alpha-ray-emitting strength for" a period of time at least as long as their normal half-lives, and in which the target material is disposed in neutron-producting relationship with said alpha rayer, means for moving said source of neutrons Within a well in proximity to respective formations through which the well extends, thereby to bombard said formations with neutrons, a detector associated with said source of neutrons for detecting gamma radiation produced by the action of said neutrons in the respective formations, and means for recording said detected radiation in correlation with well depth.

3. Neutron well logging apparatus which comprises asource ofV neutrons of the alpha`V rayer,-n target type, in which the alpha rayer consists of a radioactive series which is radium D in secular equilibrium with its daughter products, whereby the alpha-rayer daughter product will be maintained substantially free of gamma radiation and maintained at substantially constant alpha-ray-emitting strength for a period of time at least as long as its normal half-life, and in which the target material is disposed in neutronproducing relationship with said alpha rayer, means for moving said source of neutrons within a Well in proximity to respective formations through which the Well extends thereby to bombard said formations With neutrons, a detector associated with said source of neutrons for detecting gamma radiation produced by the action of said neutrons in the respective formations, and means for recording said detected radiation in correlation with Well depth.

14 4. A method of producing neutron well logs which comprises passing a substantially gamma ray-free source of neutrons of the alpha-rayertarget type Within a well, simultaneously and with movement corresponding to the movement of the source of neutrons traversing the well with a detector to measure gamma radiation produced by neutron processes in the formation penetrated by the well, continuously and simultaneously producing a log from the measurement, representing the said detected gamma radiation in correlation with Well depth, and maintaining the alpha-rayer in the source of neutrons substantially free of gamma radiation and at substantially constant alpha-ray-emtting.strength for a period of time at least as long as its normal half-life by associating with the alpha-rayer a gamma-ray-free parent substance that will continuously decay and replenish the alpha-rayer at a rate that is substantially equivalent to its rate of decay.

ROBERT E. FEARON.

JEAN M. 'I'HAYER- GILBERT SWIFT.

REFERENCES CITED Name Date Russell I, May l0, 1949 Number Certificate of Correction Patent No. 2,515,502

July 18, 195o ROBERT E. FEARON ET AL. It is hereby certified that error appears in the printed specification of the above numbered patent requiring correction as follows:

Column 1, line 49, after the word this insert s column 2, line 7, for or reag of; column 3, line 29, for bam ma, read gamma; column 8, line 45, for 1s rst occurrence, read in; column 11, line 73, f column 13, line 3, for neut or lonization read ionizing;

ron-producting read neutrowproducz'ng; and that the said Letters Patent should be e seme may conform to the l so that record of the case in the Patent Oice. lgned and sealed this 19t D A THOMAS F. MURPHY,

Assistant Uommzkszoner of Patents.

Certificate of Correction .Patent No. 2,515,502 July 18, 195o ROBERT E. FEARON ET AL.

It is hereby certified that error appears in the printed specification of the above numbered patent requiring correction as follows:

Column l, line 49, after the word this insert is; column 2, line 7, for or read of; column 3, line 29, for ba'mma read gamma,- colnmn 8, line 45, for

1s, first occurrence, read in; column 1l, line 73, for lonizatlon read ionizing; column 13, hne 3, for neutron-productlng read neutron-producmg; e

and that the said Letters Patentkshould beraad as corrected above, so that t e same may conform to the record of the case in the Patent Oiice. Signed and sealed this 19th day of December, A. D. 1950.

THOMAS F. MURPHY,

Assistant Uommz'sszoner of Patents. 

